criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
Blog Article
refers to the landmark case decided with the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. In this article’s a brief overview:
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not implement, since the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, instead he continues to be acquitted in the criminal charges based on evidence and it is actually effectively-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted from the criminal case, then on this very charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for your post because acquittal for all upcoming purposes. The aforesaid proposition is established at naught from the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of your District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
When there is no prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds small sway. Still, if there is no precedent within the home state, relevant case law from another state might be regarded via the court.
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced into the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is usually a well-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
If a target is shot at point-blank variety, it may well still be fair to infer that the accused intended death. However, that will not be always the case.
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
The law as established in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
When the petitioner is actually present for the place of incidence without causing any injury on the deceased or PWs then in these kinds of circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided through the realized trial Court after website recording of your evidence.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its probable to safe financial interests and maintain the integrity in the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, a comprehensive grasp of those changes is important for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a sturdy legal system.
Section 489-F with the Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and cash. Its primary objective would be to suppress counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity on the national currency.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory regulation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are proven by executive agencies based on statutes.